Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 454 SO2D 847 - State v. Michael

State v. Michael’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · 406 So. 2d 160 - State v. McKinney · 412 So. 2d 1335 - State v. Bell · 420 So. 2d 1099 - State v. Moore · State v. Meredith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although, within a Motion for Appeal filed on the day of sentencing, the defendant through counsel asserted “that his guilty plea was entered only after the trial court had ruled adversely on several pre-trial motions” and moved to appeal under the authority of State v. Crosby, infra, such request does not preserve the right to appeal those issues, even though an appeal is granted by the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.