¶1ORDER
¶2Randy Fisher appeals from the denial of his Rule' 29.15 motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. A formal, published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
¶3Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).