State v. Pina’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
1 district · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2014
1 district · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Contreras · 2 Ill. 2d 590 - Shell Oil Co. v. Industrial Commission · Martin v. Estrella · CESTERO v. Ferrara · State v. Ucero
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[T]he doctor’s repetition of the victim’s version of events was sure to lend it credibility. A medical expert cannot serve the function of a thirteenth juror by evaluating the credibility of witnesses.” (Citing State v. Castore, 435 A.2d 321, 326 (R.I.1981).)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Veluzat
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.