Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 455 A2D 405 - Powell v. United States

Powell v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
3
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably Irick v. United States (1989), 180 W. Va. 342 - State v. England (1988)

50 state decisions

2101983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Berger v. United States · Padilla-Martinez v. United States · Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Barbour · Greene v. Massey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The applicable test for prejudice is whether we can say, “with fair assurance, after pondering all that happened without stripping the erroneous action from the whole, that the judgment was not substantially swayed by the error.” 13 1^ The decisive factors are the closeness of the case, the centrality of the issue affected by the error, and the steps taken to mitigate the effects of the error.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “There is no question that the government may prosecute vigorously and zealously. The prosecutor, however, plays a special role in our judicial system and carries unique responsibilities... [and] is expected to know and abide by the rules of the court and his profession.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The evidence required to warrant the `intoxication-defense' instruction must reveal such a degree of complete drunkenness that a person is incapable of forming the necessary intent essential to the commission of the crime charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.