Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

455 F.2d 160

Docket No. 71-3043

Williams v. Bambauer

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Feb. 10, 1972.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1972-02-10

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1972

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Williams v. Bambauer

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1972-02-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Summary Calendar.*

¶2Frank S. Thackston, Jr., Frank W. Hunger, Lake, Tindall & Hunger, Green-ville, Miss., for defendant-appellant.

¶3Fountain D. Dawson, Greenville, Miss., Francis S. Bowling, William F. Coleman, Jackson, Miss., for plaintiffs-appellees.

¶4Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

¶6PER CURIAM:

¶7This appeal involves judgments rendered after a non-jury trial of two consolidated diversity suits for damages arising out of the same automobile accident. The opinion of the district court contains the findings of fact and conclusions of law and is reported. Williams v. Bambauer, N.D.Miss.1971, 325 F. Supp. 716. The findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, nor does any error in law appear. The judgments are therefore due to be and they are

¶8Affirmed.

/455/f2d/160 · .json · Public domain