Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 455 F.2d 228 - John Charles Thomas v. Harry R. Howard, Esquire

John Charles Thomas v. Harry R. Howard, Esquire’s Empirical Analysis

455 F.2d 228 · 1972

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Bailey v. Tucker (1993), Polite v. Diehl (1974)

25 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

29019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Henig v. Odorioso · 231 F. Supp. 347 - Pugliano v. Staziak · Hughes v. Smith · Mitchell v. Parham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “acting voluntarily by assignment from a pool of attorneys of the Essex County Legal Aid-Criminal Division, was performing his duties solely for [the client] to whom he owed the absolute duty of loyalty, as if he were a privately retained attorney. N.J.S.A. 2A:158A-11. Therefore, the affidavits demonstrate that defendant was not acting 'under color of state law, custom or usage' within the meaning of the Civil Rights Act, see, Pugliano v. Staziak, 231 F.Supp. 347 (W.D.Pa.1964), aff'd per curiam, 345 F.2d 797 (3d Cir.1965), and no triable issue of fact upon which relief may be granted remained in the case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Essex County Legal Aid Criminal Division”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.