Tummers v. Kleimack’s Empirical Analysis
455 F.2d 566 · 1972
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Gubelmann v. Gang · Robert L. Dreyfus and John W. Harrison v. Martin M. Sternau · In re Benson · Robert N. Noyce v. Jack St. Clair Kilby, Jack St. Clair Kilby v. Robert N. Noyce · Reed v. Tornqvist
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We find absolutely no merit to appellant’s contention that the examiner’s decision denying appellees’ motion to dissolve switched the burden to appellees. The examiner’s decision merely left the issue for the board to resolve after testimony was taken. •”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Snitzer v. Etzel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.