Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 455 F.2d 867 - National Labor Relations Board v. Griffith Oldsmobile, Inc.

National Labor Relations Board v. Griffith Oldsmobile, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

455 F.2d 867 · 1972

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
August 2009
most recently cited

58 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently August 2009 · most notably National Labor Relations Board v. Sauk Valley Manufacturing Co., Inc. (1973), Amalgamated Clothing and Textile Workers Union v. National Labor Relations Board (1984)

58 federal appellate ·

3301972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on O’Callahan v. Parker, Warden · Tocco v. United States · Smith v. Westchester County Bar Ass'n · Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen v. Southern Railway Co. · Magnesium Casting Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an atmosphere of fear and reprisal such as to render free expression of choice impossible.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “To request a hearing a party must, in its exceptions, define its disagreements and make an offer of proof to support findings contrary to those of the Regional Director.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “substantial and material factual issues.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.