United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
455 F.2d 932 · 1972
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2015 · most notably Minnesota v. Murphy (1984), Baumann v. United States (1982)
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 24 state decisions — followed in 17 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 5604
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Manning v. United States · U. S. Ex Rel. Lombardino v. Heyd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A probation revocation hearing is not an adversary or a criminal proceeding, Shaw v. Henderson, 430 F.2d 1116 (5th Cir. 1970); United States ex rel. Lombardino v. Heyd, 318 F. Supp. 648, 652 (E.D. La. 1970), aff'd 438 F.2d 1027 (5th Cir. 1971), but is more in the nature of an administrative hearing intimately involved with the probationer’s rehabilitation. Lombardino v. Heyd, 438 F.2d 1027 . An injection of the Miranda protection here could be toxic and produce a paresis in the probation process.” 455 F.2d at 933 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.