¶1Frank L. Ross, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendant-appellant.
¶2Richard K. Burke, U. S. Atty., Thomas N. Crowe, Asst. U. S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellee.
¶3Before MERRILL, BROWNING and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.
¶5Appellant was tried and found guilty of transporting marihuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 176a. We affirm.
¶6Appellant objects to the admission of various conversations between himself and a government witness who had loaned him the car in which the transportation took place. He bases his contention on the district court’s Local Rule 42, set *963forth in the margin,1 that requires the government attorney to furnish defense counsel, at least fifteen days before trial, with “all written or oral confessions, admissions or statements of the Defendant which the Government intends to use during the course of the trial.”
¶7 Read as a whole, the rule was plainly intended to cover only those types of statements that are generally subject to court hearings prior to admission at trial. We conclude, as did the district court, that the rule is inapplicable to statements made by the defendant to witnesses other than law enforcement personnel or their agents.2
¶8Affirmed.