Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

455 F.2d 974

Docket Nos. 26715, 26717.

United States v. Sutton

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Feb. 7, 1972.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1972-02-07

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1972

1 federal appellate ·

3 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1972-02-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*975Lee A. Holley (argued), Seattle, Wash., for Paul David Sutton.

¶2Max Gest (argued), Richard P. Fox, Los Angeles, Cal., for Lawrence Bernard Graham, Jr.

¶3Lyn I. Goldberg, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., Stephen G. Nelson, Chief Crim. Div., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

¶4Before CHAMBERS, KOELSCH and CARTER, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM:

¶6The judgments of conviction are affirmed.

¶7The appellants from material outside the record make a showing that the main prosecuting witness may have testified falsely. This is a matter that can now be the subject of a motion for a new trial. We give no indication as to what the ruling should be.

/455/f2d/974 · .json · Public domain