Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

455 F.2d 985

Docket No. 71-3431 Summary Calendar.*

Meadows v. Beto

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1972-03-10

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 1984

5 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Donlavey v. Smith · Fox v. Dutton

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1972-03-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Crawford R. Martin, Atty. Gen., Max P. Flusche, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Alfred Walker, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert C. Flowers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondent-appellant.

Will Gray, Houston, Tex., for petitioner-appellee.

Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Finding that Meadows did not have effective assistance of counsel with regard to his right to appeal from a judgment entered upon his plea of guilty of robbery in 1959 in the District Court of Tyler County, Texas, the court below granted Meadows' petition for writ of habeas corpus, 331 F.Supp. 1017.

¶2

This issue has never been presented to the courts of the State of Texas. "Having failed to exhaust state post-conviction remedies, petitioner is precluded from using this federal forum to decide this question. 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 2254; Fox v. Dutton, 5 Cir. 1968, 406 F.2d 123." Donlavey v. Smith, 5 Cir. 1970, 426 F.2d 800.

¶3

Reversed.

/455/f2d/985 · .json · Public domain