Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

455 F.2d 992

Docket No. 423, Docket 71-1893.

Rotko v. Abrams

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Jan. 10, 1972. Decided Feb. 24, 1972.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1972-02-24

3 counsel of record

Relies on 338 F. Supp. 46 - Rotko v. Abrams

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1972-02-24

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2000

11 federal appellate ·

801972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut; Robert C. Zampano, Judge.

Russell J. Rotko and Florence Rotko appeal from an order dismissing their complaint under the Federal Tort Claims Act and the Constitution.

Stanley Faulkner, New York City (Faulkner & Schmidt, New York City, Gruber & Turkel, Stamford, Conn., on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellants.

Morton Hollander, Atty., Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (L. Patrick Gray, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert M. Feinson, Atty., Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., and Stewart H. Jones, U. S. Atty., for the District of Connecticut, on the brief), for defendants-appellees.

Before MEDINA, KAUFMAN and TIMBERS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

We affirm on the opinion of Judge Zampano below, reported at 338 F.Supp. 46 (D.Conn.1971).

/455/f2d/992 · .json · Public domain