James Edward King v. A. Lamarque, Warden’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
September 2006
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Slack v. McDaniel · Coleman v. Thompson · Murray v. Carrier · Schlup v. Delo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“rule, but deny his motion with regard to his other uncertified issues Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 , 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298 , 327, 115 S.Ct. 851, 130 L.Ed.2d 808 (1995); Lambright v. Stewart, 220 F.3d 1022 , 1026 (9th Cir.2000). 2 Bennett did not foreclose alternative methods of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“delay in seeking habeas corpus relief. Clark, 21 Cal.Rptr.2d 509, 855 P.2d at 738, 750-51. There are no standards for determining what period of time or factors constitute”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“) appeals the denial of his habeas corpus petition, raising four issues, only one of which was listed within the Certificate of Appealability (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.