Caputo v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis
455 F.3d 45 · 2006
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Williams v. Taylor · Rhode Island v. Innis · In re Disbarment of Sacco · Ingalls v. Roosevelt County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[s]ince Innis , a number of courts have considered whether police may confront a suspect with evidence against him without engaging in the functional equivalent of interrogation”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“results of [an] investigation to a suspect who had herself asked the officer to let her know such results,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.