United States v. Veach’s Empirical Analysis
455 F.3d 628 · 2006
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 2021
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 115
Relies on General Electric Co. v. Joiner · Leocal v. Ashcroft · United States v. Brown · United States v. Rutherford · United States v. McCall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“At the outset, the analysis in [United States v. Walker, 393 F.3d 819 (8th Cir.2005)] ignores the more flexible articulation of [section] 4B1.2's "crime of violence” definition explained in its commentary section. See USSG § 4B1.2 cmt. n. 1. There this "or otherwise” language is removed, and the inclusion of offenses with conduct posing serious potential risk of physical injury is de-linked from any preceding specific sequence of offenses.... [T]he commentary ... in a separate sentence explains that "[o]ther offenses are included as 'crimes of violence’ if ... the conduct ... by its nature, presented a serious potential risk of physical injury to another.” Id.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[o]ther offenses are included as 'crimes of violence’ if ... the conduct ... by its nature, presented a serious potential risk of physical injury to another.” Id. United States v. Moore, 420 F.3d 1218 , 1221-22 (10th Cir.2005); see also James, 127 S.Ct. at 1592-93 (rejecting application of ejusdem generis in interpreting the residual (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] defendant need not -73- intend to violate the law to commit a general intent crime, but he must actually intend to do the act that the law proscribes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.