Levine v. Apker’s Empirical Analysis

455 F.3d 71 · 2006

Citation profile

cited by 59 later decisions

December 2017

most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 11 district ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 18 U.S.C. § 3621 · 18 U.S.C. § 3624 · 18 U.S.C. § 4046 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2243 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Church of Scientology of California v. United States · United States v. Addonizio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“(1) the resources of the facility contemplated; (2) the nature and circumstances of the offense; (3) the history and characteristics of the prisoner; (4) any statement by the court that imposed the sen- fence ...; and (5) any pertinent policy statement issued by the Sentencing Commission pursuant to section 994(a)(2) of title 28.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Wedelstedt v. Wiley · Muniz v. Sabol
“that a prisoner serving a term of imprisonment spends a portion of the final months of that term (not to exceed 12 months), under conditions that will afford that prisoner a reasonable opportunity to adjust to and prepare for the reentry of that prisoner into the community. Such conditions may include a community correctional facility.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Wedelstedt v. Wiley · Fournier v. Zickefoose
“a permissible categorical rejection of CCCs as appropriate and suitable facilities for § 3621(b) designations generally” with limited statutorily identified exceptions including”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
e.g. 509 F. Supp. 2d 573 - Jaworski v. Gutierrez · 631 F. Supp. 2d 758 - Murdock v. Gutierrez

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.