Roy v. Lampert’s Empirical Analysis
455 F.3d 945 · 2006
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Pace v. Superintendent State Correctional Institution at Graterford · Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department · Johnson v. United States · Willie Lee Miles v. Kw Prunty Attorney General of the State of California · Miller v. Marr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“replace: “Kephart was in fact told by his attorney that the statute of limitations did not expire until December of 1997, eight months after the actual expiration date. Kephart’s attorney told him of the date he believed to be the expiration date for filing his habeas claim after Kephart was already in Arizona, and therefore after the point at which he could have confirmed or disproved what his attorney informed him about AED-PA.” with “Likewise, Kephart asserted that he had had “no ... notice of the AEDPA” either from the prison library or from any other source, and that he “was not able to gain knowledge of the one year limitation period for filing under [AEDPA]” until after he had filed his state post-conviction petition and had been returned to Oregon.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Roy v. Lampert
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.