455 F. Supp. 2d 1 - John v. Russo’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 6002 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Rhode Island v. Innis · Arizona v. Fulminante · Kastigar v. United States · Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Beck[ford] defendants knew something ... about which John had not informed law enforcement.” The district court noted that the agent testified that he”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. John v. Russo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.