Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2004
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wells v. State · 158 Ind. App. 29 - American United Life Insurance Company v. Peffley · Jones v. State · American United Life Insurance Company v. Peffley · Calbert v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) The records offered must have been the original entries; 2) They must have 'been made in the regular course of business at or near the time of the event recorded; - 8) The facts must have been within the first hand knowledge of someone whose business duty it was to observe and report the facts; and 4) The witness who had knowledge of the facts must be unavailable. (citing Wells v. State (1970), 254 Ind. 608 , 261 N.E.2d 865 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bryce v. State“It is sufficient if the person having a duty to make and maintain the record has left the employ, and has been replaced by another.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“force that creates a substantial risk of serious bodily injury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lambert v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.