Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 455 N.E.2d 932 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently September 2009 · most notably State v. NICK R. (2009), Mitchem v. State (1997)

2 federal appellate · 36 state decisions

210198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rideout v. United States · Loyd v. State · Elmore v. State · Poindexter v. State · Zickefoose v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The crime of attempt has two elements: acting with a specific intent to commit the substantive crime and taking a substantial step toward its commission. This Court has held that to prove the requisite intent for attempted murder, the State must prove the intent needed to support a murder charge. This intent may be inferred from the use of a deadly weapon in a manner likely to cause death or great bodily harm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Solomon v. State
  2. “Obviously the crime against one victim is separate and distinct from the crime against the other victim. This case involves two separate crimes committed against two separate victims and separate sentences were properly imposed for each crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Henderson v. State
  3. “thereafter turned her car to go directly to [the second victim] and strike her.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Dupin v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.