Muday v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 1996
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 165 Ind. App. 369 - Winston v. State · Trustees of Indiana University v. WILLIAMS · Morris v. State · Grier v. State · Holt v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Entrapment. It is a defense that: (1) The prohibited conduct of the person was the product of a law-enforcement officer, or his agent, using persuasion or other means likely to cause the person to engage in the conduct; and (2) The person was not predisposed to commit the offense. (b) Conduct merely affording a person an opportunity to commit the offense does not constitute entrapment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gitary v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.