455 N.J. Super. 56 - State v. Ferguson’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Hogan · United States v. Brunty · Pizzullo v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance · State v. Maldonado · State v. Denofa
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There must be territorial jurisdiction in New Jersey for the State to prosecute a crime here. The State has the power to prosecute crimes that occurred within its borders but may not bring charges for offenses committed entirely in another state or country.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a motion to dismiss an indictment, the court should consider whether 'there is some evidence establishing each element of the crime[,]' and should view that evidence in the light most favorable to the State”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the initial possession and transportation of heroin by Ferguson and Potts in New Jersey [were] 'intrinsic' to the drug's ultimate distribution in New York, and thus sufficient to confer jurisdiction here.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.