Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 455 P.2d 702 - Walters v. State

Walters v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
October 2003
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. State · Pate v. State · Robison v. State · Swarb v. State · Wallace v. Kopenbrink

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * [I]f counsel wishes to preserve in the record alleged errors committed during the closing argument of the State, * * *, it should be called to the attention of the court by timely objection, together with a request that the jury be instructed to disregard the improper statement * * *. In the event counsel for the defendant considers the remarks so fundamentally prejudicial that the court cannot, by instructions to the jury, correct such error, counsel for defendants should move for a mistrial and preserve this in his Motion for a New Trial.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall have the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury of the county in which the crime shall have been committed....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.