Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 455 SO2D 1096 - Brumley v. State

Brumley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
May 2001
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 448 So. 2d 1013 - State v. Rhoden · 414 So. 2d 509 - Williams v. State · 452 So. 2d 95 - Weston v. State · Neal v. State · Cofield v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether, by operation of the contemporaneous objection rule, a defendant is precluded from challenging, on direct appeal, the trial court's retention of jurisdiction over one-half of his sentence when no objection to such retention is made at the time of sentencing?”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.