Martin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently November 2012 · most notably Martin v. Wainwright (1985), 705 So. 2d 1337 - San Martin v. State (1997)
1 federal appellate · 23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Witt v. State · Hance v. Georgia · Wheat v. Mississippi · 400 So. 2d 956 - Smith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The appointment of experts is discretionary. The test for overturning a trial court ruling on appointing an expert is whether there has been an abuse of discretion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.