Schwadel v. Uchitel’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2002
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 402 So. 2d 606 - State v. Hawkins · Mize v. State · Prince George's Country Club, Inc. v. Edward R. Carr, Inc. · Orlando Orange Groves Co. v. Hale · 374 So. 2d 54 - Oxford Intern. Bank & Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, Etc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to protect the shareholders from fundamental change, or more specifically to protect the shareholders from the destruction of the means to accomplish the purposes or objects for which the corporation was incorporated and actually performs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“provisions governing such transactions. The Schwadel court noted that the purpose of a shareholder consent provision is”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the corporate assets and was subject to the statutory rights and protections extended to stockholders under Florida's”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.