Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

455 So. 2d 615

455 So.2d 615

9 Fla.L.Weekly 1938

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 12, 1984

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1984-09-12

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-09-12

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2003

1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

30198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The sole issue meriting discussion is whether the trial court has jurisdiction to enter sanctions against a youthful offender for violating the terms of his community control program. Following our recent decision in Clem v. State (Fla. 4th DCA, Case No. 81-2243, opinion filed August 29, 1984), the trial court has jurisdiction to consider the violation of the terms of his community control program. Accordingly, we affirm and the same questions certified in Clem v. State, supra, are incorporated herein by reference and likewise certified.

¶2AFFIRMED.

LETTS, HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.
/455/so2d/615 · .json · Public domain