455 So. 2d 975 - Julius v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
May 1989
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Beck v. Alabama · Proffitt v. Florida · Keeble v. United States · Hopper v. Evans · 283 So. 2d 1 - State v. Dixon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Code 1975, § 13-11-6 (8). After the trial court had delivered a lengthy charge to the jury and the jury had *Page 986 begun to deliberate, the jury asked the trial court to redefine the elements of the crimes with which Julius was charged. The trial court repeated its lengthy charge on these definitions and in conclusion stated:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"It's only if you don't find any aggravating circumstances that you then have to determine whether it's murder in the first degree, murder in the second degree, manslaughter, or again, not guilty."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.