Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

455 S.W.3d 523

State v. Seal

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 2015

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2015-03-03

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 2017

7 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2015-03-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM:

¶2Appellant Robert Seal appeals from his conviction of one count of burglary in the second degree, § 569.170, and one count of stealing a firearm, § 570.030. Appellant contends that the trial court erred by denying his request for a. mistrial and by improperly sentencing him based upon his decision to exercise his right to trial. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal Written opinion. However, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

¶3Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

/455/sw3d/523 · .json · Public domain