McEachern v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2017
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 753
Relies on Douglas v. People of State of California · Ross v. Moffitt · United States v. MacCollom · Brine v. State · City of Portland v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Petitioner does not argue, nor could he argue, that he is challenging the underlying criminal conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kimball v. State“issues that could have been decided on a prior petition for post-conviction relief”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Carsetti v. Maine“are barred from subsequent consideration”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Carsetti v. Maine
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.