United States v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
456 F.2d 1192 · 1972
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently July 1994 · most notably United States v. Recalde (1985), United States v. Smaldone (1973)
22 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2312 · 18 U.S.C. § 3501 · 28 U.S.C. § 1864
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Brinegar v. United States · Escobedo v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“need not be conclusive on the issue of voluntariness of the confession”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Davis alleges improper jury selection procedures. He complains that the jury venire members were “left-overs” from another trial. There was another case being tried to a jury at the same time as the Davis trial. Those excused from jury duty at the other trial were directed to report to the courtroom where Davis’ trial was to be heard. Davis contends that this procedure is not in accord with 28 U.S.C. § 1864 . He cites no authorities in support of his contention and he does not demonstrate any prejudice. Davis was provided a lawful panel from which the jury was selected. Frazier v. United States, 335 U.S. 497 , 69 S.Ct. 201 , 93 L.Ed. 187 (1948).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lujan v. People
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.