Johnson v. Morton’s Empirical Analysis
456 F.2d 68 · 1972
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 460L · 16 U.S.C. § 460L
Relies on Baker v. Carr · Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp · Flast v. Cohen · Association of Data Processing Service Organizations Inc v. B Camp Barlow · Mackay v. Nesbett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. . . the Supreme Court, in Association of Data Processing Service Organizations v. Camp, 1970, 397 U.S. 150 , 90 S.Ct. 827, 25 L.Ed.2d 184, formulated a dual test for standing. The first question to be determined is whether the plaintiffs allege '. . . that the challenged action has caused [them] injury in fact, economic or otherwise.' 397 U.S. at 152, 90 S.Ct. at 829. The second inquiry is whether the interest sought to be protected is '. . . arguably within the zone of interests to be protected or regulated by the statute or constitutional guarantee in question.' 397 U.S. at 153, 90 S.Ct. at 830. See also Barlow v. Collins, 1970, 397 U.S. 159 , 90 S.Ct. 832, 25 L.Ed.2d 192.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A person suffering legal wrong because of agency action, or adversely affected or aggrieved by agency action within the meaning of a relevant statute, is entitled to judicial review thereof.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.