Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 456 F.3d 1209 - Prier v. Steed

Prier v. Steed’s Empirical Analysis

456 F.3d 1209 · 2006

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
April 2019
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De Guinee · Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. · Church of Scientology of California v. United States · U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership · Mills v. Green

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Constitutional mootness doctrine is grounded in the Article III requirement that federal courts may only decide actual ongoing cases or controversies.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he Declaratory Judgment Act does not extend the jurisdiction of federal courts[,] it [does] enlarge[ ] the range of remedies available.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The crucial question is whether granting a present determination of the issues offered . . . will have some effect in the real world.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.