Davy v. Central Intelligence Agency’s Empirical Analysis
456 F.3d 162 · 2006
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 16 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Davy v. Central Intelligence Agency (2008), Aronov v. Napolitano (2009)
15 federal appellate · 16 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 3601 (§ 801 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968)) · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act)
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Buckhannon Board and Care Home Incs v. West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources · Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School District · Copeland v. Marshall · Smyth ex rel. Smyth v. Rivero
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) contain[ ] mandatory language ...; (2) [are both] entitled an 'ORDER'; and (3) bear[ ] the district judge's signature, not those of the parties' counsel,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Four non-exclusive factors typically govern the entitlement inquiry: '(1) the public benefit derived from the case; (2) the commercial benefit to the plaintiff; (3) the nature of the plaintiff's interest in the records; and (4) the reasonableness of the agency's withholding' of the requested documents.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he CIA ... will provide plaintiff all responsive documents, if any, to his 2000 FOIA request ... [a]s soo[n] as possible after [May 31, 2001], but in no case later than [July 13, 2001].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.