Prieto v. Quarterman’s Empirical Analysis
456 F.3d 511 · 2006
Citation profile
15 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 2020 · most notably Mathis v. Thaler (2010), Granger v. Aaron's, Inc. (2011)
15 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Davis v. Johnson · Fisher v. Johnson · Fisher v. Texas · United States v. Avants · United States of America v. Gary Allen Patterson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The district court issued an order appointing counsel for Prieto and setting filing deadlines. Under the court’s scheduling order, Prieto’s habeas petition was due by May 3, 2002. On April 16 Prieto moved for, and the district court granted, an extension of time to file his habeas petition. Under the district court’s order, Prieto’s petition was due by September 6, 2002. On August 2, 2002, more than a month before that deadline, Prieto filed his habeas petition. The State responded with a motion to dismiss on the ground that Prieto’s petition was untimely because he filed it after the applicable limitations period expired.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sossa v. Diaz“[a]lthough AED-PA applied to Prieto’s application, the district court’s order granting him additional time for the express purpose of filing his petition at a later date was crucially misleading.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sossa v. Diaz“to be timely, Prieto had until approximately the end of April 2002 to file for federal post-conviction relief. Instead, Prieto filed his habeas petition almost 100 days late, on August 2, 2002.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sossa v. Diaz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.