Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 456 FSUPP 474 - Marshall v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

Marshall v. Weyerhaeuser Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
4
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Osh Oshd Establishment Inspection of Gilbert Bennett Manufacturing Company Routh Marshall v. Chromalloy American Corporation (1979), Donovan v. Wollaston Alloys, Inc. (1982)

10 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

17019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1337 · 28 U.S.C. § 1345 · 29 U.S.C. § 651 (§ 2 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970)

Relies on Foman v. Davis · Franks v. Delaware · Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco · See v. City of Seattle · Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “National-Local plan designed to achieve significant reduction in the high incidence of occupational injuries and illnesses found in the metal-working and foundry industry.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “While the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not specifically recognize an Order to Show Cause, federal courts have uniformly acknowledged and treated it similarly to the typical motion but for its preferential place on the court's docket.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “evidence must be presented with each warrant application to show that the administrative standards are being applied to a particular establishment in a neutral manner”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.