Commonwealth v. Runyan’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
2 district · 14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Palko v. State of Connecticut · Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc. · District of Columbia v. Heller · Wolf v. People of the State of Colorado · United States v. Cruikshank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Under this provision, a person registered to keep a firearm (apart from law enforcement personnel) was prohibited in any circumstance from carrying or keeping a loaded firearm in his or her home. The ordinance prohibited a registered gun owner from keeping even an unloaded firearm in his or her home unless it was disassembled or rendered inoperable by a trigger lock or similar device.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““Except for law enforcement personnel described in § 7-2502.01(b)(l), each registrant shall keep any firearm in his possession unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock or similar device unless such firearm is kept at his place of business, or while being used for lawful recreational purposes within the District of Columbia.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“does not make it impossible for those persons licensed to possess firearms to rely on them for lawful self-defense”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Williams v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.