Commonwealth v. Loadholt’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
34
cited by 34 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
July 2022
most recently cited
2 district · 30 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Crawford v. Washington · Rhode Island v. Innis · Duncan v. State of Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“cartridges or cartridge cases, primers (igniter), bullets or propellant powder designed for use in any firearm, rifle or shotgun.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“As a consequence, the [instruction] did not properly set forth each essential element”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.