Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 456 Md. 209 - In re C.E.

In re C.E.’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rohrbeck v. Rohrbeck · Davis v. Davis · Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Los Angeles Rams Football Co. · Sigma Reproductive Health Center v. State · In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. 10941

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “previous mental health diagnoses include paranoia, adjustment disorder, major depression, somatization disorder, borderline personality disorder, mania, and bipolar affective disorder.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The juvenile court's findings were supported by the evidence presented and the court's CINA determination was supported by the law. Accordingly, we hold that the trial court did not err nor abuse its discretion when it found C.E. to be CINA and committed him to the custody of the Department.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “juvenile courts repeatedly have found that [Mother] displayed a complete inability to care for her children, control her emotions, or effectively communicate with her children and the Department.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.