In re C.E.’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rohrbeck v. Rohrbeck · Davis v. Davis · Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Los Angeles Rams Football Co. · Sigma Reproductive Health Center v. State · In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. 10941
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“previous mental health diagnoses include paranoia, adjustment disorder, major depression, somatization disorder, borderline personality disorder, mania, and bipolar affective disorder.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The juvenile court's findings were supported by the evidence presented and the court's CINA determination was supported by the law. Accordingly, we hold that the trial court did not err nor abuse its discretion when it found C.E. to be CINA and committed him to the custody of the Department.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“juvenile courts repeatedly have found that [Mother] displayed a complete inability to care for her children, control her emotions, or effectively communicate with her children and the Department.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.