People v. Lemmon’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
36
cited by 36 later decisions
4
states following
August 2019
most recently cited
31 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is the province of the jury to determine questions of fact and assess the credibility of witnesses.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“As the trier of fact, the jury is the final judge of credibility.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“for any cause for which by law a new trial may be granted, or when it appears to the court that justice has not been done. " (Emphasis added); MCR 6.431(B) similarly allows a court to order a new trial "on any ground that would support appellate reversal of the conviction or because it believes that the verdict has resulted in a miscarriage of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Redd
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.