Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 456 Mich. 625 - People v. Lemmon

People v. Lemmon’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
4
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

31 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is the province of the jury to determine questions of fact and assess the credibility of witnesses.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “As the trier of fact, the jury is the final judge of credibility.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “for any cause for which by law a new trial may be granted, or when it appears to the court that justice has not been done. " (Emphasis added); MCR 6.431(B) similarly allows a court to order a new trial "on any ground that would support appellate reversal of the conviction or because it believes that the verdict has resulted in a miscarriage of justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.