Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 456 N.W.2d 111 - State v. Hoffarth

State v. Hoffarth’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 2024

14 state decisions

701990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Jensen · State v. Storbakken · State v. Schumacher · State v. Wells · State v. Hagemann

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(c) Insuring that the plea is voluntary. The court shall not accept a plea of guilty without first, by addressing the defendant personally [except as provided in Rule 43(c) ] in open court, determining that the plea is voluntary and not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from a plea agreement. The court shall also inquire as to whether the defendant’s willingness to plead guilty results from previous discussion between the prosecuting attorney and the defendant or the defendant’s attorney. (Emphasis added.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Farrell · State v. Beckman
  2. “THE COURT: What is your plea? THE DEFENDANT: Guilty, Your Honor. THE COURT: Has anyone made any promises or threats in order to get you to enter a guilty plea? THE DEFENDANT: No. THE COURT: Is there a plea agreement involved in the case? MR. ROMANICE: No, Your Honor. MR. MARTIN: No. Your Honor, there is not. THE COURT: You understand that you could be sentenced to more or less than what is recommended by the prosecutor in this case? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, Your Honor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Beckman
  3. “(b) Advice to defendant The court may not accept a plea of guilty without first, by addressing the defendant personally [except as provided in Rule 43(c) ] in open court, informing the defendant of and determining that the defendant understands the following: [[Image here]] (3) That the defendant has the right to plead not guilty, or to persist in that plea if it has already been made, or to plead guilty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Beckman

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.