Beaird v. Ramey’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently July 2021
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Shapard v. State · 89 Okla. Crim. 312 - Ex Parte Pruitt · 91 Okla. Crim. 210 - Clark v. State · 88 Okla. Crim. 192 - Ex Parte Musgrave
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . .a preliminary hearing is not a trial to determine the guilt of accused, but only the two issues: ‘Was a crime committed, and is there reasonable cause to believe the defendant committed said crime.’ ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Mooney v. State · Roberts v. State“At the preliminary hearing, a defendant must not be denied his Constitutional right to be confronted with his accusers”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Randolph v. State“a personal privilege for benefit of accused, which may be waived by him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Randolph v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.