Roberson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 1997
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 6 Okla. Crim. 415 - Stouse v. State · 27 Okla. Crim. 278 - Cooper v. State · 19 Okla. Crim. 14 - Smith v. State · 70 Okla. Crim. 143 - Allen v. State · 56 Okla. Crim. 454 - Dixson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(a) The driver of any vehicle involved in an accident resulting in injury to or death of any person shall immediately stop such vehicle at the scene of such accident or as close thereto as possible but shall then forthwith return to and in every event shall remain at the scene of the accident until he has fulfilled the requirements of section 10-104. Every such stop shall be made without obstructing traffic more than is necessary. “(b) Any person wilfully, maliciously, or feloniously failing to stop, or to comply with said requirements under such circumstances, shall be guilty of a felony and upon conviction thereof be punished by imprisonment for not less than ten days nor more than one year, or by a fine of not less than Fifty Dollars ($50.00) nor more than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00), or by both such fine and imprisonment. “(c) The Commissioner of Public Safety shall revoke the license or permit to drive and any nonresident operating privilege of the person so convicted.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Laughton v. State““It is the duty of defendant to question jurors on their voir dire as to their qualifications, and if he fails to do so, he waives any objection on that point, even though disqualification is unknown to him until after rendition of verdict.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Edwards v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.