Richmond v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 1997
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 82 Okla. Crim. 5 - Bingham v. State · Barber v. State · Cody v. State · 97 Okla. Crim. 279 - Holman v. State · 94 Okla. Crim. 122 - Stanley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘ . . . If a question of fact as to the connection of the article sought to be admitted with the defendant or the crime is raised, the evidence should be admitted for the determination of the jury. The lack of positive identification in such a case affects the weight of the article or substance as evidence, rather than its admissibility.’ [Emphasis added].””
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Anderson v. State · Lucas v. State““Instructions, when considered as a whole, are sufficient if they fully and correctly state the law applicable to the case.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Vavra v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.