– State v. Downing –’s Empirical Analysis
2020
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McCain Foods USA, Inc. v. Central Processors, Inc. · 30 Kan. App. 2d 889 - State v. Alvis · State v. LeClair · 22 Kan. App. 2d 60 - State v. Schultz · 25 Kan. App. 2d 472 - Herrick v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Statutory interpretation is a question of law over which an appellate court exercises unlimited review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Davis“To establish this charge, each of the following claims must be proved:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'without authority, entering into or remaining within'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.