Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 456 So. 2d 1021 - State v. Orlando

456 So. 2d 1021 - State v. Orlando’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1989
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Ohio v. Roberts · Pointer v. Texas · California v. Green · Harrington v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Before a co-conspirator's declaration may be introduced under this exception, a prima facie case of conspiracy must have been established and it must be shown that the declaration was made in furtherance of the common enterprise and during its continuation [citations omitted] ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] witness is not `unavailable' for purposes of the... exception to the confrontation requirement unless the prosecutorial authorities have made a good-faith effort to obtain his presence at trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.