Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 456 So. 2d 1268 - Toole v. State

456 So. 2d 1268 - Toole v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 1985
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Waters · 359 So. 2d 446 - Purifoy v. State · 248 So. 2d 526 - Rumph v. State · 438 So. 2d 1034 - Bennett v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the state charges a defendant did intend to commit a specific offense after the breaking and entering occurs, then the state must prove that the defendant did in fact intend to commit this offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the Bennett analysis misinterprets [ State v. Waters, 436 So.2d 66 (Fla. 1983)] and imposes a burden on the state not required by Waters .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.