Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 456 So. 2d 845 - Gwin v. State

456 So. 2d 845 - Gwin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
8
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably Hill v. Jones (1996), Arthur v. State (1996)

36 state decisions

1501984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · 368 So. 2d 871 - Cumbo v. State · Skelton v. City of Birmingham · United States v. Xheka

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “comprehend all assistance rendered by acts or words of encouragement or support or presence, actual or constructive, to render assistance should it become necessary.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`[t]he now-governing Alabama rule is that if either the party now offering the former testimony, or the party against whom it is offered, was not a party or the successor of a party to the former litigation, the former testimony is not receivable for or against either.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a defendant may waive his right to appeal as part of a negotiated plea agreement so long as he is fully advised of its implications and he voluntarily agrees to enter into the agreement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.