456 So. 2d 916 - Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently September 2000 · most notably State v. McKenna (1987), 553 So. 2d 323 - In the Interest of W.E.B. v. State (1989)
31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · Brown v. Illinois · United States v. Dionisio · Davis v. Mississippi · 382 So. 2d 697 - State v. Bender
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if the officer, based upon reasonably trustworthy information, has knowledge of facts and circumstances sufficient to cause a person of reasonable caution to believe that the suspect driver was under the influence of alcoholic beverages at the time of the accident and caused the ... serious bodily injury of a human being.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. James · State v. Cesaretti“[I]f a law enforcement officer has probable cause to believe that a motor vehicle driven by or in the actual physical control of a person under the influence of alcoholic beverages or controlled substances has caused the death or serious bodily injury of a human being, such person shall submit, upon the request of a law enforcement officer, to a test of his blood for the purpose of determining the alcoholic content thereof or the presence of chemical substances... .”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“An appellate court will not consider grounds of objection to the admissibility of evidence unless they have been stated with specificity in the trial court”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Feller v. State · Mathis v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.